Image courtesy: Blame Society Productions
The Andersons, Inc. last week declared its fourth consecutive quarter of record earnings in a conference call that would have been unremarkable if not for statements made by Gary Smith, the Maumee, Ohio-based company's vice president of finance.
Asked about the impact of high corn prices on the company's ethanol business, Smith made one of the first high-level acknowledgements of validity in the problem of using agriculture as fuel feedstock.
"In the end, if you have economics driving it and you look at the impact of a dollar increase in corn and what that does to your variable cost for reducing a gallon of ethanol," Smith said, "then you look at it for what it does to your variable cost for producing a pound of beef or a pound of pork or chicken or eggs.
"It's pretty easy to conclude that you'll keep putting corn to feed before you'll slow down or shut down ethanol plants…before you'll dramatically shut down feeding, and I think most of us would prefer to eat first," he continued in response to a question about the risk to margins from Wall Street Access analyst Charlie Rentschler.
"So, I think kind of the dark side of ethanol is the combination of what you're talking about, Charlie," Smith said. "It's just that simple."
Smith quickly added that, on the other hand, the company's grain division had shown an "amazing ability" to increase crop yields on existing land. "I think that's going to continue to occur," he continued. Also, "new" farmland could also come out of the USDA Farm Service Agency's Conservation Reserve Program.
"There is a substantial amount of land out there that all of us are paying for that is not in production that I believe could be put in production," Smith said. "I think that's terribly unfortunate, especially given the situation like you're describing, Charlie. So I would hope at some point in time we'll see the productive amounts of those lands come back into production to help mitigate the risk that you laid out."
Following Smith's remarks, Rentschler protested that new ethanol production would require a 15-16% increase in crop productivity "just to feed the incremental ethanol plants coming on-stream" this year.
"Certainly, yields aren't going to jump up like that year-over-year. There's no way that's possible," the analyst said.
"I get your point," Smith responded.
Recent Comments